What Makes Family Business Succession Work: Tradition, Qualification, and Governance

Succession in family businesses ranks among the most demanding and most far-reaching phases in a company’s development.  

Though widely seen as a single event, succession is a long-term process that has to be managed systematically. What that looks like in practice emerges from conversations with German mid-sized companies in industry and trade, and these observations are confirmed and reinforced by relevant research findings.

How Generation Affects Family Business Succession

How succession plays out depends heavily on the generation a family business has reached. Firms in their first or second generation are often still defined by the founder’s personality, while those with a longer history tend to run on settled structures, processes, and well understood roles. Each further generation adds complexity, as ownership spreads across more shareholders and their interests pull in different directions. That is what makes a firmer institutionalization of decision-making and clearer succession rules necessary.

One family business we interviewed is now in its seventh or eighth generation, and no family member has held an operational management role for several generations. Its governance structure was put in place early, partly because of the several family branches involved, a point we return to later. Another company we spoke with, a large distribution business, shows the opposite. There, even the handover from the founder to the next generation proved difficult and only partly succeeded, even though the structures at that point were still fairly simple and clear.

Why Preparation Has to Start Early

Successful handovers begin long before the formal transfer. The earlier a family selects, educates, and prepares the next generation, the more likely the succession is to work, and this counts among the clearest success factors of all. Studies show that companies working from a long-term succession strategy are far better prepared than those that respond only once a handover is upon them. Preparation here means both formal education and deliberate personal and professional growth. In practice, the most effective path is to let the next generation pursue an education suited to their abilities and interests, then prove themselves elsewhere, abroad or in another company, before the question of joining the family business comes into focus. The decision to step into the leadership is best made out of personal conviction rather than family duty.

One interviewee from a seventh-generation family business described taking a different career path first and only choosing succession deliberately, after he had already held early leadership roles in the firm. A choice made freely, he found, builds commitment to the role and improves the chances of leading well over the long run. Mentoring and coaching can ease this move into leadership and support a successor’s development along the way.

Why Outside Experience Builds Acceptance and Competence

Many family businesses that handle succession well expect potential successors to spend their early careers outside the company. Time spent proving themselves elsewhere builds competence, independence, and standing within the organization. It also helps establish the legitimacy a successor will need in a later leadership role. Because the ability to lead and a long view of the business are themselves success factors, successors need room to develop both and to grow into the role marked out for them. Several interviewees made the same point, that experience outside the family business does a great deal for a person’s confidence, readiness to lead, and sense of how a business works. Seeing other company cultures, leadership styles, and ways of organizing widens what a successor can picture doing, and it makes questioning long-settled habits and bringing in new ideas far easier.

Merit Over Lineage

A steady focus on qualification is another success factor that comes through clearly. For family members and outside executives alike, the criteria that should decide an appointment are professional ability, personal fit, and the capacity to lead. Research shows that filling key roles mainly on the basis of family membership raises the risks over time, while merit-based selection helps a company hold its own in the market.

An interviewee from a mid-sized distribution company, where management includes both outside executives and third- and fourth-generation family members, traced part of the firm’s financial trouble to managers who had been handed their roles on family membership alone, without the professional or personal qualifications the jobs called for.

How Governance Structures Keep a Family Business Stable

As a business grows more complex, the way its governance is set up matters more. Professionally staffed advisory boards and supervisory bodies do much to hold the balance between what owners want and what the day-to-day leadership needs. Agency theory and stewardship theory both make the same point, that a company needs well defined ways of making and checking decisions if it is to stay efficient and stable over time. Sound governance keeps a company able to steer itself, most of all during a handover but at any other time too. Practical experience also shows, again and again, the risk in handing over too late. When the change comes only because of illness or sudden time pressure, there is rarely enough room for a proper transition and handover. Passing responsibility on early and in stages does the opposite and makes a smooth generational change far more likely.

Giving the Next Generation Room to Lead

A handover works only when the successor is qualified and the outgoing generation is willing to make room for them to lead. Several interviewees stressed that successors come into their own only when they can take the company forward in keeping with their own character, values, and ideas about leadership, without severing the roots it has grown. That is hardest in long-established family businesses, where decision-making had sat with a single figure for years. Opening the door to current leadership thinking, to a wider range of voices, and to a culture that fits the times came up again and again as something a company’s future depends on. It asks the outgoing generation to hand over responsibility in steps and to let new approaches through.

Lasting Business Continuity as the Overriding Goal

Beyond every question of structure and personnel, the lasting, financially sound survival of the company stays the guiding principle behind any succession plan. The private interests of individual family members have to give way to that aim. It takes a shared sense of values and a readiness to carry responsibility from one generation to the next.

Conclusion

Succession in a family business is a layered, many-sided process that has to be approached early and with foresight. Long-term preparation, outside experience, a steady commitment to merit, and stable governance together form the ground a sound handover stands on. Just as important are the outgoing generation’s readiness to pass responsibility on in good time and the successors’ chance to gather their own experience, arrive at their own way of leading, and take the company forward in line with who they are and what their era demands.

The interviews suggest that successful succession owes less to any single measure than to a company culture lived out over many years. Where merit, a sense of responsibility, openness to change, and professional structures meet, a family business has a far better chance of carrying on across generations. Here too, the company’s lasting survival is the measure everyone works toward, and individual interests give way to it.

References

Bennedsen, M.; Nielsen, K. M.; Pérez-González, F.; Wolfenzon, D. (2007): “Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance.” In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 647 to 691.

Dettori, A.; Floris, M. (2023): “Improving Continuity by Simplifying the Structure of Family Firms: A Replication Study.” In: Management Review Quarterly, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 635 to 660.

Gersick, K. E.; Davis, J. A.; Hampton, M. M.; Lansberg, I. (1997): Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Gottschalk, S.; Höwer, D.; Licht, G.; Niefert, M.; Hauer, A.; Keese, D.; Woywode, M. (2010): Generationenwechsel im Mittelstand. Herausforderungen und Erfolgsfaktoren aus der Perspektive der Nachfolger. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW).

Institute for SME Research (IfM) Bonn: Business Succession. Statistics, Bonn.

Kormann, H. (2014): Die Arbeit der Beiräte in Familienunternehmen. Gute Governance durch Aufsichtsgremien. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Gabler.

Kormann, H. (2017): Governance des Familienunternehmens. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Lansberg, I. (1999): Succeeding Generations: Realizing the Dream of Families in Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

May, P. (2012): Erfolgsmodell Familienunternehmen. Das Strategie-Buch. Hamburg: Murmann.

Papesch, M. (2010): Corporate Governance in Familienunternehmen. Eine Analyse zur Sicherung der Unternehmensnachfolge. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

Pérez-González, F. (2006): “Inherited Control and Firm Performance.” In: American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 5, pp. 1559 to 1588.

Rieger-Fels, M.; Schlömer-Laufen, N.; Suprinovič, O.; Rauch, A. (2025): Unternehmensnachfolgen in Deutschland 2026 bis 2030. IfM Bonn: Daten und Fakten No. 37, Bonn.

Schwartz, M. (2026): Nachfolge-Monitoring Mittelstand 2025. Fokus Volkswirtschaft No. 526, KfW Research, Frankfurt am Main.

Sharma, P.; Chrisman, J. J.; Chua, J. H. (2003): “Succession Planning as Planned Behavior: Some Empirical Results.” In: Family Business Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1 to 15.

Stephan, P. (2002): Nachfolge in mittelständischen Familienunternehmen. Handlungsempfehlungen aus Sicht der Unternehmensführung. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

Wegmann, J.; Wiesehahn, A. (2015): Unternehmensnachfolge. Praxishandbuch für Familienunternehmen. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

About the Author

Dr. Lavinia Brancaccio is a Partner at Stanton Chase Düsseldorf with more than ten years of experience in executive search and consulting. She advises clients on C-level and board appointments, with a focus on family-owned, medium-sized companies in Germany and across Europe, and particular experience in the industrial sector and in life sciences and healthcare. She holds a PhD from LMU Munich and works in German, English, and Italian.